Analysis Of The Movie Marion Crane - 879 Words

Marion Crane leaved Phoenix she isn’t married, but wants to move with her boyfriend, however money is a big dilemma for both of them until her boss client drop on her desk $40,000 to close a deal and she decide to runaway to California and meet her boyfriend, but after look suspicious for sleeping on the side of the road the first night, she decided to take the back roads next day to avoid police and she stopped at â€Å"Bates Motel† the second night where she meets Norman Bates, that owns the place and look really friendly, but it is obvious that he has issues with his mother. Overview of the Film Themes: Money $40,000 that Marion stole from her boss and put her in the Motel. The money shows on numerous scenes, but at the end money is just money Birds Norman office is full of birds all stuffed and he shows big passion for what he does and even compare Marion with the birds, but then contradicted himself on what he is saying. Mother Norman’s mother is in charge of everything, she owns the hotel and have total control of Norman’s life. Voyeurism Norman intentional put Marion in room 1 to be able to spy on her when she was undressing and getting ready to go to bed. Bathroom The most important and long scenes happened in the bathroom, even the clue that assure that Marion stays in â€Å"Bates Motel†. Mental illness Norman Bates suffers from personality disorder and can’t distinguish on what he does or what his mom does or make him do. Serial Killer At the end we find out the MarionShow MoreRelatedNorman Bates1736 Words   |  7 PagesGenital. Even though Sigmund Freud never was writing about the movie _Psycho_, theories of Freud, have a great connection with the personality of Norman Bates. According to Oedipus complex, by Sigmund Freud, it introduced the term for a child s libidinal attachment to the opposite sex parent, while experiencing jealousy and dislike of the same sex parent, as an expression of infantile sexuality. The character Norman Bates, in the movie _Psycho_, showed many signs of having an Oedipus complex whenRead MoreThe Child That Lives From Within1611 Words   |  7 Pagesquestion if psychopathic behaviour is innate or a product of social environment. The answer seems difficult to discern because it is not split down into equal parts of nurture and nature, but rather rely on one another for a better understanding. In the movie Psycho by Alfred Hitchcock, Norman Bates’ downfall proposes how crucial a healthy childhood is to the mental state of developing child. Contrary to nature focused beliefs, not all human behaviour comes from an individual’s genetic makeup, but ratherRead MoreFilm Analysis of Alfred Hitchcocks Psycho2250 Words   |  9 PagesFilm Analysis of Alfred Hitchcock’s â€Å"Psycho† Introduction â€Å"Psycho† (1960) is based on a novel of the same name by Robert Bloch. The film was directed by Hollywood legend, Alfred Hitchcock. The screen play was written by Joseph Stephano and based on the real life crimes of serial killer, Ed Gein. The film stars Janet Leigh, Anthony Perkins, John Gavin and Vera Miles. The film garnered four academy award nominations and widely regarded as one of Hitchcock’s best films. It spawned two sequels, aRead MoreThe Child That Lives From Within1681 Words   |  7 Pagessocial sciences often question if psychopathic behaviour is innate or a product of a social environment. Recently, nurture-based theories has gained credibility in understanding how a child’s upbringings can trigger psychopathic behaviour. In the movie Psycho by Alfred Hitchcock, Norman Bates’ downfall proposes how crucial a healthy childhood is to mental health rather than biological vulnerability. Contrary to nature-focused beliefs, not all human behaviour comes from an individual’s genetic makeupRead MoreMetz Film Language a Semiotics of the Cinema PDF100902 Words   |  316 PagesPhenomenology of the Narrative, 16 II Problems of Film Semiotics Chapter 3. Chapter 4. Chapter 5. The Cinema: Language or Language System? 31 Some Points in the Semiotics of the Cinema, 92 Problems of Denotation in the Fiction Film, 108 III Syntagmatic Analysis of the Image Track Chapter 6. Outline of the Autonomous Segments in Jacques Rozier s film Adieu Philippine, 149 Chapter 7. Syntagmatic Study of Jacques Rozier s Film Adieu Philippine, 177 vii viii CONTENTS IV The Modern Cinema: Some TheoreticalRead MoreMonsanto: Better Living Through Genetic Engineering96204 Words   |  385 Pages441 441 CASE STUDIES A summary of the case analysis I N T R O D U C T I O N Preparing an effective case analysis: The full story Hearing with the aid of implanted technology: The case of Cochlearâ„ ¢ – an Australian C A S E O N E high-technology leader Delta Faucet: Global entrepreneurship in an emerging market C A S E T W O DaimlerChrysler: Corporate governance dynamics in a global company C A S E T H R E E Gunns and the greens: Governance issues in Tasmania C A S E F O U R Succeeding in theRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesLine 58 Understanding and Appreciating Individual Differences Important Areas of Self-Awareness 61 Emotional Intelligence 62 Values 65 Ethical Decision Making and Values 72 Cognitive Style 74 Attitudes Toward Change 76 Core Self-Evaluation 79 SKILL ANALYSIS 84 Cases Involving Self-Awareness 84 Communist Prison Camp 84 Computerized Exam 85 Decision Dilemmas 86 SKILL PRACTICE 89 Exercises for Improving Self-Awareness Through Self-Disclosure 89 Through the Looking Glass 89 Diagnosing Managerial Characteristics

Alcohol Is The Number One Drug Used By College Students

According to research and statistics, alcohol is the number one drug used by college students. Most individuals do not label alcohol as a drug due to the way it is consumed, but when considering the negative side effects that accompany alcohol, the comparison of alcohol to drugs may not be that far of a stretch. Alcohol can not only be harmful to an individual’s external health but also their internal health as well. Consumption of alcohol over a long period of time may result in negative side effects to your heart, liver, pancreas, immune system, and ultimately if enough is consumed may result in cancer. This addicting, yet dangerous drug is best known for its ability to relax the body, reduce tension, and ultimately place the body into a†¦show more content†¦(H. Wechsler, 2000) (H. Wechsler, J.E. Lee, M. Kuo, H. Lee, College binge drinking in the 1990s: A continuing problem Journal of American College Health, 48 (2000), pp. 199–210) Statistics show that the a verage college student will consume more than 34 gallons of alcohol each year. From an outside point of view, alcohol may seem harmless and a normal part of the college experience, however research suggests that alcoholism and the college athlete should not in fact go hand in hand. A survey was conducted at a large university and data was collected on intercollegiate athletes during the competitive season and during the off-season. Those who participated in the survey were asked to estimate the amount of alcohol consumption levels of 4 different groups of individuals; closest athlete friend, closest non-athlete friend, typical athlete, and typical non-athlete. Results of both in-season and off-season indicated that the athletes reported that others consumed more drinks per week than they did, and insights of these social averages predicted personal use. Although the typical athlete average emerged as the strongest predictor of personal alcohol use, the relative strength of the rela tionships between individual behavior and the athlete and non-athlete norms varied according to seasonal status. (Kristen Dams-O Connor, November 2007) (Social norms and alcohol consumption among intercollegiate athletes: The role of athlete and non-athlete reference groups, Kristen Dams-O

Morehead Cain Essay Example For Students

Morehead Cain Essay A monologue from the play by Lord Byron NOTE: This monologue is reprinted from Lord Byron: Six Plays. Lord Byron. Los Angeles: Black Box Press, 2007. LUCIFER: A superior?! Superior?!No! By heaven, which heHolds, and the abyss, and the immensityOf worlds and life, which I hold with him—No!I have a Victor—true; but no superior.Homage he has from all—but none from me:I battle it against him, as I battledIn highest Heaven—through all Eternity,And the unfathomable gulfs of Hades,And the interminable realms of space,And the infinity of endless ages,All, all, will I dispute! And world by world,And star by star, and universe by universe,Shall tremble in the balance, till the greatConflict shall cease, if ever it shall cease,Which it neer shall, till he or I be quenched!And what can quench our immortality,Or mutual and irrevocable hate?He as a conqueror will call the conqueredEvil, but what will be the Good he gives?Were I the victor, his works would be deemedThe only evil ones. And you, ye newAnd scare-born mortals, what have been his giftsTo you already, in your little world?But few; and some of those but bitt er.Back with me, then, to thine earth, and try the restOf his celestial boons to you and yours.Evil and Good are things in their own essence,And not made good or evil by the Giver;But if he gives you good—so call him; ifEvil springs from him, do not name it mine,Till ye know better its true fount; and judgeNot by words, though of Spirits, but the fruitsOf your existence, such as it must be.One good gift has the fatal apple given—Your reason: — let it not be overswayedBy tyrannous threats to force you into faithGainst all external sense and inward feeling:Think and endure, — and form an inner worldIn your own bosom — where the outward fails;So shall you nearer be the spiritualNature, and war triumphant with your own.

The two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky

Both Ferdinand de Saussure contribute their popular theories on linguistics. The research centres on the popular linguistic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure. The research includes research on the similarly popular linguistic concepts of Noam Chomsky. The two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky complement each other to explain how humans communicate with one another.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Linguistic pertains to both language and communication. Douglas Robinson (2003, p. 26) emphasized â€Å"Linguistics is the study of language: even etymologically this is an obvious fact. In the twentieth century, however, the term came to signify a single fairly narrow approach to language and to exclude everything else of interest that might theoretically be included within it. Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky were linguists. Emile Benveniste was a linguist; Jacques Derrida was not.† The quote clearly shows that some quarters have devoted much of their time and effort to study how the language of one community evolved. The linguists have focused much of their time to understanding language growth. Ferdinand de Saussure. Ferdinand de Saussure emphasized that both language and speech are both composed of a system of signs (Saussaure, 2011, p. 17). The language and speech both precipitated from the social environment. Ferdinand de Saussure also insisted that language was not an innate act. Ferdinand de Saussure theorized that the person’s language and speech are learned while the person is interacting with other persons and influences. Language learning is biological in nature (Andenson Lightfoot, 2002, p. 3). For example, the Japanese person learned to speak the Japanese language while growing up in a Japanese community. Likewise, the British Child l earned United Kingdom English from conversing with one’s relatives and friends. The Arab child could speak fluent Arabic because the Arab person had grown up in a community where Arabic is the official language. In addition, the Chinese child will learn the Chinese language from his close relatives and friends. In terms of signs, Ferdinand de Saussure emphasize that different individuals have different signs for an object. For example, the Japanese have a different Japanese word for a tree. Similarly, the Chinese have a different word for the same tree. The German child has a different sign or word for the same universal tree (Kistner, 2008, p. 3).Advertising Looking for essay on linguistics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Further, Ferdinand de Saussure insists that linguistics is a co-dependent act. The person learns the meaning of signs by conversing with another person. For example, the Japanese person will inform t he British citizen the Japanese word for a car. Likewise, the Chinese person will inform the British visitor the Chinese word for a car. The Egyptian resident will teach the British visitor the Egyptian word for a car. The example indicates that British visitor learns the different words for a car by conversing with the individuals from different countries (Saussaure, 2011, p. 20). Furthermore, Ferdinand de Saussure insists that language and speech is a learned language. The child first learns the alphabet. After learning the alphabet, the child learns to read words by joining two or more letters. After the child learns to read words, the child learns to read sentences. The child learns to identify an object by a word. For example, the child learns that the picture of an apple should be written â€Å"apple†. The child learns that the picture of a bus should be written as â€Å"bus†. In addition, Ferdinand de Saussure also teaches that people learn to obey instructions through learning. The child learns the word â€Å"stop† means the child should halt actions that are meant to be stopped. The child also learns that the word â€Å"sleep† means that the child should go to his or her room to go to sleep. The child learns the word â€Å"eat† means that the child must gobble a morsel of food. The example clearly shows that Ferdinand de Saussure was right in emphasizing that language is learned, not inherited (Saussaure, 2011, p. 20). Likewise, Ferdinand de Saussure insists that linguistics includes professionals learning their trade by studying. The engineers must pass the licensure exam for engineers. The lawyers must pass the licensure exam for lawyers. No one can pass the engineering board exams without first enrolling in an engineering course. Further, Ferdinand de Saussure emphasized that linguistics includes a body of special knowledge. The engineers have their own set of engineering technical language. The doctors will be at a lost if they listen to engineers talking about the topic â€Å"strength of building materials†. In the same light, the engineers will be confused when they hear medical doctors talking about â€Å"surgical terminologies†. The engineers will not understand the doctors when they speak about the different parts of the human body. The engineers do not have an idea as to where the body’s â€Å"posterior† part is.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The lawyers also have their own set of linguistics jargons. The lawyers speak in terms of legal terminologies like â€Å"rejoinder†. The medical doctor will be confused when the lawyer talks about the word â€Å"respondent† in a conversation with another lawyer. Ferdinand de Saussure is right is stating that language is a learned a ffair, not an inherited one (Saussaure, 2011, p. 20). In the same light, Ferdinand de Saussure reiterates that the pronunciation of words influenced by the linguistic sense of the speakers (Harris Taylor,1997, p. 182). The British English sound for the word â€Å"government† is different from the American pronunciation of the same word. The Chinese person will pronounce the same word â€Å"government† using the Chinese intonation. The Japanese individual will definitely use Japanese influence in pronouncing the same word â€Å"government†. Ferdinand de Saussure was right in stating the each individual adopts’ one’s cultural background in pronouncing the same word. Further, Ferdinand de Saussure is right in stating that different cultures influence how a sentence is done. Language is the key ingredient to understanding teh human thought process (De Beaugrande, 1991, p. 124).Eating with chopticks in China is a normal linguistic message. Language is a social contract among the members of the community (De Saussure, 1959, p. 14). Eating with spoons and forks is linguistically okay in another country. In Canada, people do not use spoons and forks to eat their food, another linguistic situation. In some countries, people customarily eat with their bare hands. Ferdinand de Saussure shows that each group has its own linguistic interpretation of how proper eating should be done (Saussaure, 2011, p. 8). However, Ferdinand de Saussure does not explain how two strangers can communicate with each other. A visiting Japanese visitor cannot understand the British language. However, the Japanese visitor can use utterances to indicate to the British person that the Japanese is angry at the British person. In addition, the German visitor cannot understand the British language. However, the German male bachelor can smile at the beautiful British girl who is passing by the world famous London Clock. The girl will understand the smile to mean the German visitor is interested in the girl. The girl may respond favourably or unfavourably to the German visitor’s overtures favourably. In terms of favourable terms, the British girl may smile back to the German visitor. The response will surely encourage the German visitor to move closer to the British girl and get to know her better. On the other hand, an unfavourable response may include not noticing the German visitor.Advertising Looking for essay on linguistics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This way, the girl sends a message to the German visitor that she is not interested in the German visitor’s overtures. In turn, the German visitor may not give up on his love interest, the British girl. The German visitor may give the British girl a lovely rose to show that he is serious in his overtures. The British girl may accept the rose or reject the rose. Again, there are sign language words passed from the girl to the German visitor. In the same manner, there are sign language words passed from the German visitor to the British girl. Ferdinand de Saussure did not include this type of language, the innate universal grammar language, in his theories. The innate universal grammar language is espoused by Noam Chomsky in the next paragraphs. NOAH CHOMSKY. Geoffrey Huck (1996, p. 5) theorised Noam Chomsky believes that language is innate. Noam Chomsky believes that each child is born with a universal language, an infinite number of grammar sentences (Chapman Routledge, 2005 , p. 130). For example, the baby will cry if he or she is hungry. The child will laugh if he or she is happy. Noam Chomsky is correct in this way. The Japanese child will cry when hurt. The Chinese child will cry when it is hungry. The Arabian child will cry when he is in pain. The British child will cry when is hungry. The Eskimo’s child will cry when in pain. Clearly, Noam Chomsky is right in emphasizing that each child has an innate language which can be understood by different persons from any part of the world. Noam Chomsky explains that humans are like animals, having an innate language. Language is a system of rules (Joseph, Love, Taylor, 2001, p. 122). During the dinosaur age, the human beings learned to communicate with one another. The humans of that prehistoric age learned that showing an angry face will stop the other person from pestering the angry person. The facial expression of the person is enough to convey a message that the person is angry. In turn, the ot her person will stop what one is doing in order to avoid having a fight or disagreement with the angry person. Just like animals, Noam Chomsky states that humans show through sign language their true feelings. The person can use hand signals to ask the other person to come closer. The person can also use the hand signals â€Å" a stop sign† to indicate to the approaching person to stop walking towards the person making the stop sign. Noam Chomsky calls this language learning activity as Language Acquisition Device (Huck, 1996, p. 13). No one can question Noam Chomsky’s theory that sign language is a universal language among the people around the world. For example, one person shouting unfamiliar words to a complete stranger gives a message to the other person that the shouting person is trying to convey a message to the other person. The next step is for the two persons to communicate in a more vivid manner. The second person can give a sign language asking the shoutin g person to clarify his message (Huck, 1996, p. 12). However, Noam Chomsky’s theory is not 100 percent accurate. There is a slight probability that the sign language in one community may be different from the sign language from another community. For example, a complete stranger smiling to a beautiful girl may infuriate the girl’s husband, a person belonging to a conservative society. The girl’s husband mistakes the smiling as flirting with his wife. The jealous husband will either hide his wife from the eyes of the stranger or confront the stranger. A possible fight may occur when the girl’s husband confronts the stranger. The innocent stranger tries to pacify the girls’ husband by using his own body language techniques. One possible end to the body language exchange is a peaceful settlement between the girl’s husband and the stranger. The stranger may offer a gift to pacify the angry girl’s husband. The giving of a gift is another s ign language that the girl’s husband can easily understand (Huck, 1996, p. 23). Noam Chomsky proposes that each person has an innate set of transformational grammar words (Barsky, 1998, p. 174). People will understand the different and unfamiliar utterances because of their innate language. The strong person will push the weak person to indicate the strong person does not want the weak person beside him. In addition, the husband points his wife to the kitchen to indicate the husband is hungry. The wife will understand the husband’s sign language and start cooking the husband’s food. In addition, Noam Chomsky proves that the average person has an innate language. Noam Chomsky states that the growing child has the capacity to learn a new language. The child’s capacity to learn a new language is one of the child’s survival weapons. Children will adapt the new language to understand the world around the child (Barsky, 1998, p. 100). Further, the child must quickly learn the language of the parent in order to survive. The Japanese child has the capacity to learn the Japanese language in order to understand the vivid messages of the parents. The Chinese child has the capability to comprehend the Chinese language in order to understand the parent’s instructions. The British child has the ability to understand the British language in order to survive in the world. Noam Chomsky explains that the secret to the innate language is syntax. Noam Chomsky states that the children use syntax to learn the language of their parents quickly. The child uses the universal grammar approach effectively. Noam Chomsky insists that child’s use of universal grammar bridges the gap between linguistic stimuli of the child and rich linguistic language that the child learns from his or her parents or relatives (Barsky, 1996, p. 157). However, many individuals claim that Noam Chomsky is too discriminating. Noam Chomsky insists that all children use the universal grammar. The universal grammar is grounded on the English language. The syntaxes only concern the English language. This is understandable because Noam Chomsky’s native tongue is the English language. For example, Alastair Pennycook (2001, p. 46) insists â€Å"Since applied linguistics always has to do with language in some form, the development of a political vision of language must indeed form a backbone to critical applied linguistics. I have already alluded to a possible distinction between looking at the politics of language in terms of how forms of power affect language use.† Further, Noam Chomsky did not explain why different societies or countries have produced their own set of unique languages. Sarah Taub (2001, p. 8) proposes â€Å"As we have seen, iconic linguistic items are related to their meanings through physical resemblance. We should note, however, that there are many different possible iconic representations of a single visual or a uditory image; for example, one could represent different parts of the image or use different perspectives†. Applying the scientific process, Noam Chomsky should perform more experiments to validate his universal grammar claim. Noam Chomsky should visit Germany to study how each child learns the German language quickly. The other languages have their own sets of syntaxes that may not be in the same plane as the English language syntaxes. Based on the above discussion, Both Ferdinand de Saussure contribute their own versions of linguistics. The linguistic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure focus on learning as a prerequisite for understanding language. The linguistic concepts of Noam Chomsky focus on a child having innate universal language, using syntax grammar. Indeed, the two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky complement each other discussing how individuals communicate with one another. References Andenson, S., Lightfoot, D. (2002). The Language Or gan: Linguistics as Cognitive  Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Barsky, R. (1998). Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent. London: University Press. Chapman, S., Routledge, C. (2005). Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy  of Language. New York: Oxford University Press. De Beaugrande, R. (1991). Linguistic Theory: The Discourse of Fundamental Works. New York: Longman Press. De Saussure, F. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press. Harris, R., Taylor, T. (1997). Landmarks in Linguistics Thought I: The Western  Tradition from Socrates to Saussure. New York: Routledge Press. Huck, G. (1996). Ideology of Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and Deep  Structure Debates. London: Routledge Press. Joseph, E., Love, N., Taylor, T. (2001). Landmarks in Linguistics Thought II: The  Western Tradition in the Twentieth Century. New York: Routledge Press. Kistner, M. (2008). Linguistic Sign Theories. London: Grin Press. Pennycook, A. (2001 ). Critical Applied Linguistics. London: Lawrence Erlabaum Press. Robinson, D. (2003). Performative Linguistics: Speaking and Translating as  Doing Things with Words. London: Routledge Press. Saussaure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. London: University Press. Taub, S. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity in American Sign  Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This essay on The two linguistic concepts of Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky was written and submitted by user Gauge Burks to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.